BioProfile analysis · recovery scan

Only your blood knows your inflammation levels. How you recover, you do. Three questions, a direction.

Your result in 3 minutes

The result screen of the BioProfile recovery scan on a phone, with a recovery proxy of 44 and the reading band at noticeable

Your recovery proxy across your ordinary weeks, with the reading band it falls in and, for each question, the number that set the direction. All on your own screen, in your dashboard, with the blood value named alongside as the next step.

Three questions about how you recover, how often things hurt and which way your food leans. You get a recovery proxy from 0 to 100 with the reading band alongside it, and the honest reason it is not an inflammation score. An analysis, never a diagnosis.

Free

3 questions

About 3 minutes

Proxy from 0 to 100

Fill in your first name and email address, and your recovery proxy is in your dashboard.

Three questions that lay bare why you recover more slowly than you used to, and what can honestly be said about that

(and the scientifically grounded reason we print no inflammation score here)

A hard workout costs you two days now, where it used to cost one. A cold hangs on a week longer. In the morning your hands are stiff and nobody knows what from. And somewhere you have read that this is inflammation, low-grade, chronic, the word of the year, and that you can have it measured in a webshop for 89 euros.

The awkward thing about inflammation is that it is a blood measure. In the whole literature there is no questionnaire that measures systemic inflammation, and any product that gives you an inflammation score out of a questionnaire has made that score up. What a questionnaire can honestly do is this: record how quickly you recover, how often things hurt, and which way your daily food leans. Those are real things about your week. It is not a window onto your blood.

So that is exactly what we do, and that is what we call it too: three questions, added up into a recovery proxy from 0 to 100, deliberately dimmed until a blood value lies beside it. No inflammation score. No diagnosis. A direction, yes, and the most honest first step for anyone who wants to know their values: first know whether there is anything to measure.

The first two questions of the BioProfile recovery scan, about recovery after exertion or illness and about unexplained pain or stiffness
Questions 1 and 2 of 3. For each question you pick the answer that comes closest to your ordinary weeks.

Most people start at the solution

An anti-inflammatory diet. Turmeric, omega 3, a cold water bath, a home test for CRP with nobody to read the result. All understandable, and all of them start in the same place: with what you are going to do about it.

So after two months you still do not know whether it did anything. You have recorded nowhere how you recovered when you started, and recovery is exactly the pattern you only notice when it lets you down. Without a starting value, every change is a feeling about a feeling.

We analyse the real cause first

At BioProfile we turn the order around. First we record what is there now, in three questions that are honest about what they measure, and only then do we talk about what you do with it, with the blood value as the step that turns a proxy into a result. Analyse first, advise after.

The recovery scan is the shortest step in that analysis, and the most modest: it says out loud what it is not.

The question about what you would most like to improve, in the BioProfile scan, with the goal of this scan ticked
The scan starts with what you want to improve.

What you get back in about three minutes

You start with eight short questions about yourself. They do not count towards your result; they make sure we can read the rest properly. One of them you may skip.

Then come the three recovery questions, about your ordinary weeks: how quickly you recover after exertion or illness, how often you have unexplained pain or stiffness, and how often you have heavily processed food and sugary drinks. Each question has four answers.

You fill in your first name and email address. You see a first picture straight away, and with one tap on your dashboard your recovery proxy is on your screen, with the reading band next to it. In your email there is a login link, so you can find your outcome again later and extend your scan with a blood value.

Start screen of the BioProfile recovery scan with the button to begin
Where you land when you click the button on this page.

This is what is on your screen after about three minutes:

  • Your recovery proxy from 0 to 100: a direction on recovery and nutrition
  • The reading band it falls in, from a slow to a quick recovery pattern
  • For each question how heavily it weighed, from low to high, so you can see where the trouble sits
  • An honest limit: why no questionnaire at all can give you an inflammation score
  • A login link in your email, and high-sensitivity CRP as the blood value that turns the proxy into a result
The screen where you fill in your first name and email address to see your result
First name and email address, and your first picture is on your screen.

Add one blood value later and the proxy becomes a result. Until then you no longer have a feeling about your recovery, but a starting value.

Fill in your first name and email address, and your recovery proxy is in your dashboard.

What we ask you

Three questions about your ordinary weeks: how quickly you recover after exertion or illness, how often you have unexplained pain or stiffness, and how often you have heavily processed food and sugary drinks. For each question you pick the answer that sits closest to your weeks.

  • Recovery after exertion or illness
  • Unexplained pain or stiffness
  • Heavily processed food and sugary drinks
Questions 2 and 3 of the BioProfile recovery scan: unexplained pain or stiffness, and how often you have heavily processed food and sugary drinks
Questions 2 and 3. The pain question and the nutrition question; the latter is a light question about a direction, and so a tendency and not a measurement.

What this scan is based on

Neither of the two cards is a questionnaire, and that is the point: the first is the blood measure that really measures inflammation, the second the only published index for the inflammation-promoting potential of food. The three questions of the scan measure recovery and eating pattern, and that is why they are called a proxy.

used descriptively only

C-reactive protein

Nowhere in the literature is there a validated self-report questionnaire for systemic inflammation. The real measure is a blood value, high-sensitivity CRP. What you see here is a result about recovery and eating pattern, labelled as a proxy, and any product that gives you an inflammation score out of a questionnaire has made that score up.

Used only descriptively. We do not apply the diagnostic rule behind it here.

Validated for: measuring systemic inflammation in blood.

C-reactive protein, StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf.

used descriptively only

Dietary Inflammatory Index

The only published index in this field scores the inflammation promoting potential of an eating pattern, not the inflammation in a person, requires a full dietary history and is patented. That is why we ask one light question about your eating pattern, take the answer as a tendency and not as a measurement, and say so at the row as well.

Used only descriptively. We do not apply the diagnostic rule behind it here.

Validated for: the inflammation-promoting potential of food, not the inflammation of a person.

Dietary Inflammatory Index, PubMed Central.

Read these rows as what they are: how quickly you recover, how often things hurt, and which way your daily food tends. Those are real things about your week. It is not a window on your blood.

What this scan cannot tell you

Why this row is dimmed

This is the clearest limit in the whole analysis. Systemic inflammation is a blood measure, and no self-report instrument for it exists. We keep the row because recovery speed and eating pattern are worth knowing and worth changing, and we label it a proxy so it can never be confused with the thing it sits beside. It is deliberately capped at low reliability on answers alone, and one hs-CRP value lifts it further than any number of extra questions could.

BioProfile scoring rules, measurement class E, proxy basis, reliability capped at low on questionnaire data alone.

How your result is put together

Each of the three questions gets 0 to 3 points, from quick to slow. The points are added up and converted into a recovery proxy from 0 to 100. Higher is better, and it is a proxy: a direction about recovery and food, and not an inflammation score.

0 to 39

slow recovery pattern

40 to 59

noticeable

60 to 79

mild

80 to 100

quick recovery pattern

Reading bands, not clinical cut-off values. Your questions about inflammation and recovery are worded in house and modelled on validated instruments, so no published cut-off value applies to precisely this score. Higher is always healthier.

This scan falls in measurement class E: there is no questionnaire that measures inflammation, so on answers alone the reliability is low and the row stays deliberately dimmed. What lifts it is one blood value, high-sensitivity CRP, and you can add that in your full BioProfile; then it is a result and no longer a proxy.

On your result screen that reliability sits as a label next to your result: low signal, proxy. That label is not an aside; it says exactly how much weight you may hang on the number.

The three recovery questions read back on the result screen of the BioProfile scan, each with your answer and a score from 0 to 100
This is how the software builds up your result: every question gets its own number from 0 to 100, the lowest at the top.

What the science says about this

This page describes a measuring instrument, so below you can read where that instrument comes from and what has been studied about it. Every claim points to the source it appears in.

Inflammation is real, and the yardstick is a blood value

In 1997 Ridker and colleagues measured C-reactive protein in 543 healthy men: those in the highest quarter had 2.9 times the chance of an acute heart problem and 1.9 times the chance of a vessel problem in the brain as those in the lowest quarter.⁠1 In 2010 the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration pooled 54 studies with 160,309 people: per threefold rise in CRP, 1.37 times the chance of a heart condition, corrected for the usual risk factors, and a comparable association with death outside heart and vascular disease.⁠2 In 2003 the American Heart Association and the CDC set down how that blood value ought to be used in practice.⁠3

Furman and colleagues described in 2019 how chronic low-grade inflammation is the common ground beneath the biggest causes of death, and which factors drive it: infections, too little movement, poor food, toxins and psychological stress.⁠4 Those are the things you influence yourself. The measure stays blood. That is why this scan can only put a direction on it, and that is exactly what it does.

Why a questionnaire is a proxy here, and not a measurement

The only published index in this area is the DII from Shivappa and colleagues: around 6,500 articles screened, 1,943 scored, 45 dietary factors weighted for their effect on six inflammation markers.⁠5,6 The index scores the inflammation-promoting potential of a dietary pattern, not the inflammation in a person, and it asks for a full dietary history; in the four years after publication it was used in more than 200 studies.⁠7

Our nutrition question is a light question about the same direction, and that is why it is called a tendency and not a measurement. The blood value the analysis names, high-sensitivity CRP, is the only real measure, and adding it turns this row into a result.⁠8

Why these three in particular

Recovery after exertion: Peake and colleagues described in 2017 how the recovery time after unaccustomed exertion depends on the damage, and that inflammation, provided it is well regulated, is in fact part of the muscle’s recovery.⁠9 Sports science reached a consensus in 2018: a disturbed balance between load and recovery leads to under-recovery, overtraining, injuries and illness.⁠10 So how quickly you recover is not a feeling but a signal.

Pain and stiffness: Breivik and colleagues surveyed 46,394 Europeans and found that 19 percent had been in pain for longer than six months, and 59 percent of them for between two and fifteen years.⁠11 Nutrition: in a controlled study, Hall and colleagues put twenty adults on heavily processed food for two weeks: they ate 508 kilocalories more per day and gained 0.9 kilos.⁠12 In 2024 Lane pulled together 45 meta-analyses covering 9.9 million people: heavily processed food was associated with 1.50 times as much death from heart and vascular disease and 1.21 times as much death in total.⁠13 Aeberli gave 29 young men sugared drinks for three weeks: their hs-CRP rose by 60 to 109 percent.⁠14

What a low result means, and above all what it does not

A low recovery proxy means slow recovery, frequent pain and an eating pattern that leans the wrong way. It is not an inflammation score, and we say so in as many words on the card above. Calder and colleagues described in 2011 how food and low-grade inflammation hang together: healthy eating patterns with wholegrains, vegetables, fruit and fish go together with lower inflammatory markers, and every meal high in sugar or fat gives a temporary peak.⁠15

A low result means a blood value is worth it, and nothing beyond that. Irwin and colleagues showed across 72 studies with more than 50,000 people that poor sleep too hangs together with a higher CRP, so the proxy reads along with your sleep.⁠16 Pain or stiffness that is new, that persists or that gets worse is a reason to see a doctor, and only a doctor can make a diagnosis.

Why recovery is worth measuring

In Breivik, 61 per cent of people with long-term pain were less able or unable to work outside the home, and 40 per cent received inadequate care.⁠11 In Lane, heavily processed food was linked to 32 of the 45 outcomes studied, from mortality to mood.⁠13

That is association, not cause, and that is how those studies put it too. What it does say: recovery, pain and food are the three things you can see moving yourself, and what moves you can follow, until the blood value tells you what sits underneath.

This is what the scan rests on. Now your recovery proxy.

Fill in your first name and email address, and your recovery proxy is in your dashboard.

Written by

Jesse van der Velde

Founder of BioProfile

Jesse van der Velde

Since 2006 they have guided people towards a new body and optimal health, and have written or co-written fifteen books on nutrition and health. Forever Young (2012) and Superfood Recipes (2013) both reached number 1 in the Netherlands.

LinkedIn

Published on 27 August 2026 · Last updated on 27 August 2026

This page is written by BioProfile. BioProfile sells health products and this scan is free: no purchase comes with it. There is no validated questionnaire for inflammation, and the only published dietary index in this area, the DII, is patented and not ours. So we ask three questions of our own about recovery and food, we call the result a proxy, and nowhere do we print an inflammation score.

Sources

Every source below was checked on the day this page was published. The numbering follows the text: source 1 is the first one the text refers to, and the two sources the analysis names sit in between, at the point where they come up.

  1. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. New England Journal of Medicine, 1997. doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199704033361401
  2. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. The Lancet, 2010. doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61717-7
  3. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, et al. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2003. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000052939.59093.45
  4. Furman D, Campisi J, Verdin E, et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nature Medicine, 2019. doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0675-0
  5. Shivappa N, Steck SE, Hurley TG, Hussey JR, Hébert JR. Designing and developing a literature-derived, population-based dietary inflammatory index. Public Health Nutrition, 2014. doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013002115
  6. Dietary Inflammatory Index, PubMed Central. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Hébert JR, Shivappa N, Wirth MD, Hussey JR, Hurley TG. Perspective: the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII): lessons learned, improvements made, and future directions. Advances in Nutrition, 2019. doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmy071
  8. C-reactive protein, StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Peake JM, Neubauer O, Della Gatta PA, Nosaka K. Muscle damage and inflammation during recovery from exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2017. doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00971.2016
  10. Kellmann M, Bertollo M, Bosquet L, et al. Recovery and performance in sport: consensus statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2018. doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0759
  11. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain, 2006. doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009
  12. Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell Metabolism, 2019. doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008
  13. Lane MM, Gamage E, Du S, et al. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses. BMJ, 2024. doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-077310
  14. Aeberli I, Gerber PA, Hochuli M, et al. Low to moderate sugar-sweetened beverage consumption impairs glucose and lipid metabolism and promotes inflammation in healthy young men: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2011. doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.013540
  15. Calder PC, Ahluwalia N, Brouns F, et al. Dietary factors and low-grade inflammation in relation to overweight and obesity. British Journal of Nutrition, 2011. doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511005460
  16. Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Carroll JE. Sleep disturbance, sleep duration, and inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and experimental sleep deprivation. Biological Psychiatry, 2016. doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.014

Start your recovery scan

Three questions, about three minutes, and your recovery proxy is in your dashboard. Your answers stay private (GDPR).

Fill in your first name and email address, and your recovery proxy is in your dashboard.

Other scans

What this does not say. Nowhere in the literature is there a validated self-report questionnaire for systemic inflammation. This is not an inflammation score and we do not call it one either. The real measure is a blood value, high-sensitivity CRP, and adding that value turns this row into a result instead of a proxy. Any product that hands you an inflammation score from a questionnaire has made that score up.